<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus mju 725 SW Camera Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itechnews.net/2006/12/23/olympus-mju-725-sw-camera-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2006/12/23/olympus-mju-725-sw-camera-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Gadget News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pentax Optio W20 Waterproof Camera Reviewed - iTech News Net &#124; Latest Tech News, Gadget News and more...</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2006/12/23/olympus-mju-725-sw-camera-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-18988</link>
		<dc:creator>Pentax Optio W20 Waterproof Camera Reviewed - iTech News Net &#124; Latest Tech News, Gadget News and more...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/2006/12/23/olympus-mju-725-sw-camera-reviewed/#comment-18988</guid>
		<description>[...] Trusted Reviews says: If you need a camera that can withstand immersion in water, your choices are basically limited to the Pentax Optio W20 or the Olympus mju 725 SW that I reviewed last week. The Pentax is cheaper, smaller, takes slightly better pictures, and looks more like a normal compact than the Olympus, but lacks the shock-proof credentials. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trusted Reviews says: If you need a camera that can withstand immersion in water, your choices are basically limited to the Pentax Optio W20 or the Olympus mju 725 SW that I reviewed last week. The Pentax is cheaper, smaller, takes slightly better pictures, and looks more like a normal compact than the Olympus, but lacks the shock-proof credentials. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

