<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Gadget News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 &#124; Gadget and CellPhone Latest News</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-489387</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 &#124; Gadget and CellPhone Latest News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/#comment-489387</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Itechnews  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Itechnews  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony Alpha a450 Digital SLR Camera &#124; iTech News Net - Gadget News and Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-473586</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony Alpha a450 Digital SLR Camera &#124; iTech News Net - Gadget News and Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 05:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/#comment-473586</guid>
		<description>[...] a new member of its Alpha DLSR line, the entry-level Alpha a450 that sit in between the a500 and a350. The camera is equipped with Sony&#8217;s 14.2 Megapixel Exmor CMOS image sensor and BIONZ image [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a new member of its Alpha DLSR line, the entry-level Alpha a450 that sit in between the a500 and a350. The camera is equipped with Sony&#8217;s 14.2 Megapixel Exmor CMOS image sensor and BIONZ image [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony Alphah</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-327735</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony Alphah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/2008/04/13/sony-alpha-dslr-a350-reviewed/#comment-327735</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have several hours to do a proper review on this excellent camera, but I can quickly share the high points. It has great &quot;human factor&quot; engineering, meaning it fits your hands like a glove and all the controls are easy to access. The camera/lens combo is very light and easy to handle. If you have any Minolta lenses, they fit. The ability to view the picture on the large, bright LCD instead of through the viewfinder is a definite plus in many situations. 14  megapixels ... really, how many more do you need? 

Here&#039;s the bottom line ... I worked for Kodak, I&#039;ve been a serious amateur photographer for decades, I&#039;ve shot thousands of pictures (hundreds so far with this camera) and it leaves nothing that I can think of to be desired. If you want to spend more bucks on a Nikon or Canon, have fun. But for my money, this little beauty is a clear winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have several hours to do a proper review on this excellent camera, but I can quickly share the high points. It has great &#8220;human factor&#8221; engineering, meaning it fits your hands like a glove and all the controls are easy to access. The camera/lens combo is very light and easy to handle. If you have any Minolta lenses, they fit. The ability to view the picture on the large, bright LCD instead of through the viewfinder is a definite plus in many situations. 14  megapixels &#8230; really, how many more do you need? </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the bottom line &#8230; I worked for Kodak, I&#8217;ve been a serious amateur photographer for decades, I&#8217;ve shot thousands of pictures (hundreds so far with this camera) and it leaves nothing that I can think of to be desired. If you want to spend more bucks on a Nikon or Canon, have fun. But for my money, this little beauty is a clear winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

