<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magellan Maestro 4700 GPS Navigator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itechnews.net/2009/07/07/magellan-maestro-4700-gps-navigator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2009/07/07/magellan-maestro-4700-gps-navigator/</link>
	<description>Gadget News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:49:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim C</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2009/07/07/magellan-maestro-4700-gps-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-462234</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/?p=24535#comment-462234</guid>
		<description>I have the 4700 and is on the mark about 10&#039; on - better than Garmin which is at 30&#039; + 
What I like about the 4700 vs the Garmin is that if you take another rout it tracks that new rout in the existing rout instead of like the Garmin which keeps wanting to recalculate and a lot of time is wasted while driving. I have always used a Garmin but after owning the Magellan Maestro 4700 I will not be going back to Garmin. One extra note the software updates for Magellan is half that of the Garmin which is a Big Plus i my Book. One more note -it doesn&#039;t have a mp3 installed in it but I am after a GPS not a mp3 player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 4700 and is on the mark about 10&#8242; on &#8211; better than Garmin which is at 30&#8242; +<br />
What I like about the 4700 vs the Garmin is that if you take another rout it tracks that new rout in the existing rout instead of like the Garmin which keeps wanting to recalculate and a lot of time is wasted while driving. I have always used a Garmin but after owning the Magellan Maestro 4700 I will not be going back to Garmin. One extra note the software updates for Magellan is half that of the Garmin which is a Big Plus i my Book. One more note -it doesn&#8217;t have a mp3 installed in it but I am after a GPS not a mp3 player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck B</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2009/07/07/magellan-maestro-4700-gps-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-460573</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/?p=24535#comment-460573</guid>
		<description>Everyone seems to give the Magellan Maestro 4700, top marks.  Has anybody tested the accuracy??
I have had 2 of the Magellan Maestro 4370&#039;s and bothe get high marks for their features, but the accuracy is way off.  The units are off by 75 to 80 feet, just an street addresses.  The Titan 1, technology is really poor.  My 4250 and 5310 were excellent in their accuracy and they used Atlas III, technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone seems to give the Magellan Maestro 4700, top marks.  Has anybody tested the accuracy??<br />
I have had 2 of the Magellan Maestro 4370&#8217;s and bothe get high marks for their features, but the accuracy is way off.  The units are off by 75 to 80 feet, just an street addresses.  The Titan 1, technology is really poor.  My 4250 and 5310 were excellent in their accuracy and they used Atlas III, technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
