<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sennheiser RS 160, RS 170 and RS 180 Wireless Headphones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itechnews.net/2009/09/02/sennheiser-rs-160-rs-170-and-rs-180-wireless-headphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2009/09/02/sennheiser-rs-160-rs-170-and-rs-180-wireless-headphones/</link>
	<description>Gadget News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raphoune</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2009/09/02/sennheiser-rs-160-rs-170-and-rs-180-wireless-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-477715</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphoune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/?p=27173#comment-477715</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the transmission delay is pretty significant (50-100ms), making this headphones inappropriate for musicians. Had to send it back :(
Apart from that, nice sound and quite comfortable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the transmission delay is pretty significant (50-100ms), making this headphones inappropriate for musicians. Had to send it back <img src='http://www.itechnews.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Apart from that, nice sound and quite comfortable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2009/09/02/sennheiser-rs-160-rs-170-and-rs-180-wireless-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-476041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/?p=27173#comment-476041</guid>
		<description>If you are interested in these check out best-headphone-review.com, I found their review style to be informative and easy to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are interested in these check out best-headphone-review.com, I found their review style to be informative and easy to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomato-technoloy</title>
		<link>http://www.itechnews.net/2009/09/02/sennheiser-rs-160-rs-170-and-rs-180-wireless-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-472847</link>
		<dc:creator>tomato-technoloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itechnews.net/?p=27173#comment-472847</guid>
		<description>I had the pleasure to listen to all 3 new RS Headphones at the CBIT in Berlin.
I was more then surprised about the quality of sound of all 3 (less with the 170) specially with the RS 180.
I also heard the $ 1400.-- Sennheiser HD 800 which I didn&#039;t liked (no bass, to clear cold high).
At home I use an AKG 271 MK II with a Pro-Ject Head-Amp and as speakers I use Audio Physics Scorpio for stereo and KEF 3005.2 for surround.
Bottom line: I will purchase a RS 180</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the pleasure to listen to all 3 new RS Headphones at the CBIT in Berlin.<br />
I was more then surprised about the quality of sound of all 3 (less with the 170) specially with the RS 180.<br />
I also heard the $ 1400.&#8211; Sennheiser HD 800 which I didn&#8217;t liked (no bass, to clear cold high).<br />
At home I use an AKG 271 MK II with a Pro-Ject Head-Amp and as speakers I use Audio Physics Scorpio for stereo and KEF 3005.2 for surround.<br />
Bottom line: I will purchase a RS 180</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
